[Grief] livejournal

Heavens Blade23 heavensblade23 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 26 17:52:20 PDT 2006


Maybe we should try making the scope a bit less ambitious.  Maybe doing one
every two or three weeks
would draw more interest?

On 4/26/06, Adam Klotblixt <adam.klotblixt at tanner.se> wrote:
>
> I'm one of the few who has participated so far, and I will do it again
> if the journal goes live again. As Dave said, it will be slow going
> though, we all have lifes to live as well. BUT: I do think this is a
> good, worthwhile and fun project.
> I will do my share as/when time permits, and hope that more people will
> follow.
> I am currently uploading the ICA show to my MP3-player to accompany me
> on my walk to work tomorrow. Hard to take notes while walking, but I'll
> do my best to mail my thoughts anyway.
>
> /Adam Klotblixt
>
> David Bourgoin wrote:
>
> > Subject:
> > RE: [Grief] livejournal
> > From:
> > David Bourgoin <david_bourgoin at yahoo.co.uk>
> > Date:
> > Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:30:54 +0100 (BST)
> > To:
> > grief at hollyfeld.org
> >
> > To:
> > grief at hollyfeld.org
> >
> >
> >I'm more than happy to contribute to the Live Journal
> >but have been plenty busy with other things. I think
> >it's going to be a very slow growing thing... but from
> >little acorns do mighty oaks grow... or something like
> >that
> >
> >Dave B
> >
> >
> >--- "C. A. Polk" <capolk at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>From: Euripydes <euripydes at gmail.com>
> >>>Wh'appen..?
> >>>The tglive livejournal has gone... Too early,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>surely, to call it a day!
> >>
> >>
> >>>E.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Well - here's the deal.
> >>
> >>I made it abundantly (and repeatedly) clear that I
> >>wanted this to be a
> >>community effort. And the last two notices I made -
> >>both on the front page
> >>of the journal, and here on the list - specifically
> >>mentioned/requested that
> >>if people would like to join the fray, to please do
> >>so. And I have received
> >>- zip. Nada. Not a word. From anybody. (And the
> >>comments on the site itself
> >>have not exactly been voluminous, either - or at
> >>least not in relation to
> >>the level of interest here that seemed to be
> >>expressed at the outset.)
> >>
> >>So - this morning, I deleted the thing, to see if
> >>anyone would even notice.
> >>And lo and behold - two answers within a few hours.
> >>So what's going on? Is
> >>everybody just wanting to read it, or do we actually
> >>have people who want to
> >>contribute also?
> >>
> >>The reason I decided to set it up like I did was to
> >>keep it organized and
> >>tidy, and so it wouldn't become too much of a
> >>sprawling mess. If anybody is
> >>turned off by this, a) I'm sorry, and b) you
> >>shouldn't be. What I said, I
> >>meant - anybody that sends something to me is going
> >>to have it posted up
> >>there, unedited, and with full credit.
> >>
> >>We can change the chronological aspect also, I
> >>suppose, if anybody is having
> >>a problem with this. It would be quite easy for me
> >>to just make links on the
> >>main page that go to each disc - so whatever anybody
> >>sends can go up
> >>whenever I get it, and we can gradually fill it all
> >>in.
> >>
> >>Or - is the problem that nobody (or very few) here
> >>actually have the boxes
> >>to start with? If this is the case, then I
> >>understand, but once again - my
> >>impression from the original reactions to the idea
> >>did not lead me to
> >>believe that this was the case.
> >>
> >>Anyway - I still think it's a good idea. I've
> >>personally been sick as a dog
> >>the past few days, and also busy with other things,
> >>so I haven't even been
> >>able to get to the ICA show as of yet. Which, I
> >>thought, wouldn't be much of
> >>a problem, since I figured that surely I would have
> >>seen some stuff
> >>trickling in by now from other parties. But
> >>alas....silence.
> >>
> >>So - somebody start showing me that this is
> >>something they actually have an
> >>interest in, and we're back in business. I'm more
> >>than happy to admin and
> >>maintain the thing - IF it's a functional, ongoing
> >>concern. Otherwise, it's
> >>a rather pointless waste of time. (Kinda like this
> >>new version of
> >>"Persuasion", for instance.....but we'll let that
> >>pass for now....)  : p
> >>
> >>CAP
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Grief mailing list
> >>Grief at hollyfeld.org
> >>http://www.hollyfeld.org/mailman/listinfo/grief
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >___________________________________________________________
> >Win tickets to the 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/fifaworldcup_uk/
> >_______________________________________________
> >Grief mailing list
> >Grief at hollyfeld.org
> >http://www.hollyfeld.org/mailman/listinfo/grief
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grief mailing list
> Grief at hollyfeld.org
> http://www.hollyfeld.org/mailman/listinfo/grief
>



--
"The real problem is not whether machines think, but whether men do."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://bitsy.hollyfeld.org/pipermail/grief/attachments/20060426/d3d7fd19/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Grief mailing list