To: alt.pagan From: jai@mantra.com (Dr. Jai Maharaj) Subject: Re: Age of Aquarius Date: 29 Dec 1994 22:33:38 GMT Quoting: |Saldana_dave@mnb2.fss-moses.lockheed.com (David Saldaņa) |I am curious to know when the "age of Aquarius" begins. The Age of Aquarius is Still Centuries Away The vernal equinox will not | The Movement of Precession truly enter Aquarius until | |-7------6------5-|-4------3-------2| about the year 2500. This | |Pis |Ari | Tau| Gem| is clearly observable if we | |--------|--------|--------|--------1 examine the sky today as to | |Aqu | Vernal Equinox | Can| where the equinoctial points | |--------| Positions |--------| are occurring, which is | |Cap |6500BCE to 1991CE| Leo| still clearly well within | |--------|--------|--------|--------| Virgo and Pisces. | |Sag |Sco | Lib| Vir| Similarly, the solstices are | |--------|--------|--------|--------| still very clearly in | Positions of the Vernal Equinox Sagittarius and Gemini, and | some distance from Scorpio | degree nakshatr date and Taurus where they would | 7 07d00mPisces U. Bhadr. 1991 CE be in the Age of Aquarius. | 6 00d00mAries Ashwini 400 CE Hence the claim of some | 5 23d20mAries Bharani 1280 BCE V Western thinkers that we are | 4 06d40mTaurus Krittik 2250 BCE E A already in the Age of | 3 00d00mGemini Mrigsheer 4000 BCE D G Aquarius has no basis in the | 2 26d20mGemini Punarvasu 6000 BCE I E stars. This does not mean | 1 05d00mCancer Pushya 6500 BCE C that all positive changes in - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - humanity must wait some centuries, but that the astrological changes predicted through the shift into Aquarius cannot come into full force until the equinox actually gets there. Based on an article by Dr. David Frawley. NOTE: A Nakshatr is the 27th equal division of the sidereal zodiac. *-=Om Shanti=-* Jai Maharaj jai maharaj |_|_|_|_| mantra corporation jyotishi, vedic astrologer |_| |_| vedic prediction sciences jaimaharaj@mcimail.com |_|_ _|_| telex 6505614754 mci mail 561-4754 | | | | | voicemail +1 808 948 4357